* FRIDAY the 13th part #6 – The UtahTrust.gov BONDING is NOT Trustworthy

Written By: admin - Jan• 13•23

So MANY QUESTIONS about TRUST for the oxymoronic “UtahTrust.gov” officials:

  • How is it possible that Utah’s government employees are self-bonded by an entity UtahTrust.gov ?
  • Doesn’t self-bonding via a .gov defeat the purpose of having an outside entity insure and indemnify the We the People from abusive, tyrannical government employees who may breatk the law and/or endanger the lives, liberty and property and pursuit of happiness they are supposed to protect — but FAIL to do so?
  • Doesn’t self-bonding create a built in conflict of interest wherein the bonding company — which is also the government — be inclined to protect it money / assets from payout for collectable violations on the bonds?
  • Could it be that the self-bonding incentivizes the government entities to NOT provide PUBLIC information access about the Bonds and bonded individuals?
  • Could it be that there is NO money in the Bonding company and that it has been stolen by un-indicted co-conspirators probably from within the highest levels of government?
  • When was the Utah Local Governments Trust last audited?  And audited by whom?  A .gov Utah governmental entity? Or brother, cousin, best friend of the governor?

 

______________________

 

Setting the Stage:

The Bonding Problem


As human population increases and mutual human tolerance decreases,
municipal corporations tend to become less sensitive to individual human needs
and tend to become more antisocial toward the public.

It has been put crudely
that municipal corporations become slaughterhouse operations with law
enforcement officers running the sledgehammer department.

Judges ignore the
rights of the people and legislators generate heaps of laws, without perfecting
the ones already existing to make them fit for bonding. Defective statutes and
defective legal processes become an invitation for every sort of official
malpractice and malfeasance including economic oppression, and the public, in
retaliation, begins suing for every injury, putting the heat on the bonding
companies.

For details see https://FamGuardian.org/Subjects/Freedom/Immunity/uniform-bonding-code.pdf

 

______________________

 

December 29, 2022

 

Sent via email & Certified USPS mail: #7022 0410 0002 9777 8105

 

Steven A. Hansen – CEO       steve@utahtrust.gov

Jeff Rowley – Claims Manager    jeff@utahtrust.gov

Jody Pettet – Accounting Manager         jody@utahtrust.gov

c/o Utah Local Governments Trust             www.UtahTrust.gov

55 South Highway 89

North Salt Lake, UT 84054

.

Re: Utah GRAMA & Freedom of Information Act Request regarding bonds, insurance, and other items related to various alleged Utah government employees / officers and/or officials as listed.    (Note: CC’d to Utah Attorney General via Chief of Staff at rcantrell@agutah.gov & via Certified USPS mail: #7022 0410 0002 9777 8112 for possible future Criminal Referral.)

.

Mr. Hansen, Mr. Rowley and Mr. Pettet,

This is a lawful request for records / information under the Freedom of Information Act (F.O.I.A.), The Sunshine Act 5 U.S.C. § 552b, and Utah Public Records 63-2-301 (GRAMA), we request that a true and accurate simple answer the question YES or NO (check or mark as appropriate), if you have any records and/or information related to Utah Code 52-1-13.  Sureties — Approval — Personal surety bond — Requirements (see below) on each of the following alleged Utah government employees and/or officers and/or officials at any time during the year of 2022, please:

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah Supreme Court]:

Matthew B. Durrant                           YES ___   NO ___

John A. Pearce                                    YES ___   NO ___

Diana Hagen                                        YES ___   NO ___

Paige Petersen                                     YES ___   NO ___

Jill M. Pohlman                                  YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah Appeals Court]:

Michele M. Christiansen-Forster       YES ___   NO ___

Ryan M. Harris                                     YES ___   NO ___

David N. Mortensen                             YES ___   NO ___

Gregory K. Orme                                  YES ___   NO ___

Ryan D. Tenney                                    YES ___   NO ___

Kate Appleby                                         YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah Administrative Office of the Courts]:

Bryson King                                         YES ___   NO ___

Stacey R. Haacke                                YES ___   NO ___

Keisa L. Williams                                YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah Attorney General Office]:

Sean D. Reyes                                     YES ___   NO ___

Heather Chesnut                                 YES ___   NO ___

Ric Cantrel                                            YES ___   NO ___

Josianne E. Petit                                  YES ___   NO ___

John Earl Sullivan                               YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly connected to Utah Governor Office]:

Spencer J. Cox                                     YES ___   NO ___

Deidre Henderson                               YES ___   NO ___

Jenney Rees                                         YES ___   NO ___

Gary Herbert                                       YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly connected to Utah Fourth District Court]:

Christine Johnson                              YES ___   NO ___

Kraig J. Powell                                    YES ___   NO ___

James M. Brady                                  YES ___   NO ___

Robert Lund                                        YES ___   NO ___

Anthony Howell                                 YES ___   NO ___

Lynn Davis                                           YES ___   NO ___

Debbie Jacobsen                                 YES ___   NO ___

Roena Gammon                                  YES ___   NO ___

Mark Urry                                            YES ___   NO ___

Amber Evans                                       YES ___   NO ___

Nancy Baldarrago                               YES ___   NO ___

Mark Colby                                           YES ___   NO ___

Heather Henrie                                    YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah County Attorney Office]:

David O. Leavitt                                 YES ___   NO ___

Jared Perkins                                      YES ___   NO ___

Adam Pomeroy                                  YES ___   NO ___

Ben Stanley                                         YES ___   NO ___

Rob Moore                                          YES ___   NO ___

Dale Eyre                                             YES ___   NO ___

Laura Mendoza                                   YES ___   NO ___

PJ Maughan                                        YES ___   NO ___

Lisa Maxine Estrada                          YES ___   NO ___

Eric Johnson                                       YES ___   NO ___

   (Former attorney for Cedar Hills)

Brad Sears                                           YES ___   NO ___

   (Former mayor for Cedar Hills)

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah County Sheriff Office]:

Mike Smith                                         YES ___   NO ___

John O’Hara                                       YES ___   NO ___

Eldon Packer                                       YES ___   NO ___

Robert Weidlein                                  YES ___   NO ___

Spencer Cannon                                  YES ___   NO ___

Nathan Crawford                                YES ___   NO ___

Larry Evans                                          YES ___   NO ___

Mitchel Bailey                                      YES ___   NO ___

Jory Provostgaard                               YES ___   NO ___

James O. Tracy                                    YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah County Attorney Office]:

Andrea Allen                                       YES ___   NO ___

Jeffery Smith                                      YES ___   NO ___

Jason Thurlow                                    YES ___   NO ___

Sarah Miller                                        YES ___   NO ___

Michelle Araujo                                  YES ___   NO ___

 

Please note that no specific record is being requested for any of the individuals related to Utah Code 52-1-13., but rather, we are simply trying to determine if you have any record / information related the named entities, in that we have had no success in receiving GRAMA requested Bond related records from many of the above alleged Utah government employees/officers/officials. [Bond / Surety instrument GRAMA requests related to the above list may or may not come at a later date.]

We Intend to Collect lawful compensation for unlawful violations of Law in trespass against us by certain alleged Utah government employees/officials and/or officers, and are simply attempting to confirm if any record or information on the above alleged Utah government employees may be maintained YES or NO by the Utah Local Governments Trust – thus helping us consider and determine if your entity may have records on them, and if and how we may make a lawful claim against those who are required to have indemnity instruments described in Utah Code 52-1-13, etc., that may or may not be maintained by Utah Local Governments Trust. Simple. Easy.

52-1-13. Sureties — Approval — Personal surety bond — Requirements.
In all cases a bond is required of any public officer in this state, either a corporate surety bond or a personal surety bond may be given. Such bonds shall be subject to approval as provided by law. No personal surety bond shall be approved except with two or more sureties and each such surety shall first make and file an affidavit setting forth that he is a resident and freeholder within the state of Utah and is worth the sum specified in the undertaking, over and above all of his just debts and liabilities and exclusive of property exempt from execution and shall include in such affidavit a detailed statement of all of his assets and liabilities; and the making of any material false statement in respect thereto shall constitute a felony; provided further, that when there are more than two sureties thereon, they may express in their affidavits that they are severally worth amounts less than that expressed in the bond if the whole amount of all sureties is equivalent to double the penalty of the bond. No premium on any surety bond with personal sureties shall be paid from any public funds. The several boards, courts or officers authorized by law to approve bonds herein referred to may require sureties on personal surety bonds to justify annually and, in case of failure to so justify, such boards or officers may require additional sureties or a new bond. In case of failure of any public officer to have his sureties justify when so required or to furnish additional sureties when required, as herein provided, the board or officer charged with the duty of approving the bond of such officer shall declare such office vacant within 60 days after notice personally served upon the officer, and at the expiration of said 60 day period such office shall become vacant unless such sureties justify or additional qualified sureties be furnished within said period.

Note: Public official surety bond related requests fall under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, The Sunshine Act 5 U.S.C. § 552b, Utah Public Records 63-2-301 (GRAMA) invoked herein, and by law you are obligated to supply us with this information within 10 business days of email receipt.

 

This GRAMA REQUEST under Utah Code 63G-2-203 as follows:   

 

Please provide a simple response “YES” or “NO” (checking the appropriate designation right into this document if helpful to expedite the reply) that Utah Local Government Trust maintains any record / information on the named alleged Utah government employees / officials and/or officers – thus confirming or denying their status as a lawful employee / officer and/or official, as required of such under Utah Code 52-1-13.

 

√   YES, we may be found the subject of existing or future records as it relates to our Intent to Collect on various violations of Law by the alleged Utah government employees / officials and/or officers.

√   YES, we want the records for FREE as a public service as this is requested in the public interest (We the People) of as we attempt protect our lives, rights and freedom from corrupt, tyrannical government officials which is to be included in a likely forth coming documentary film production for the benefit of the public – and fellow Utahns particularly.  (see Utah Code 63G-2-203)

√   YES, if NOT agreeable for FREE we are willing to pay, and offer $50 as a guesstimate for what should be a simple database search requiring little if any time, but which will instantly be responded to if cost $$ estimate is provided by email, so we may quickly make payment electronically a.s.a.p.

√   YES, please provide the records to both emails:  kencromar5@gmail.com and barbaracromar@gmail.com , with signed hard copy sent via USPS mail to the address below.

√   YES, we REQUIRE these confirmation of record existence YES or NO regarding each alleged employee / officer / official within 10 working days from email receipt, December 29, 2022 by January 13, 2023 without fail.

Please remember that “Open & Honest” government need not obfuscate, deflect or delay a direct answer to direct YES or NO questions – as lawfully required by Utah’s GRAMA law.

Thank you for your most expeditious, professional and timely fulfillment of this lawful request.

Sincerely,

 

 

________________________                   __________________________

Paul-Kenneth: Cromar                   &        Barbara-Ann: Cromar

Producer / Director / Screenwriter

Former Cedar Hills Councilman – July 1994 to January 2000

c/o 9870 N. Meadow Drive

Cedar Hills, Utah  [84062-9998]

801-400-5900

– or –

PO Box 942

Pleasant Grove, Utah  [84062-9998]

CC: Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes via Chief of Staff at rcantrell@agutah.gov & via Certified USPS mail: #7022 0410 0002 9777 8112

 

 

________________________

 

 

 

________________________

 

Misc.  HIGHLIGHT from FamGuardians’ PDF which can be downloaded here…

* FamGuardian.org – uniform-bonding-code

BONDS

Organized Crime in Government
Government officials maintain control of the courts by “licensing lawyers” and
by forbidding the common citizens to “practice law” or give “legal advice,” three
phrases which have never been adequately defined for any statute. To protect
government dominance, “law schools” are the only schools allowed to teach law,
and specifically “safe law” (attornment).

.

To protect malfeasance, attorneys are
forbidden to file criminal complaints against malfeasance officials, officer and
clerks and against officers of other corporations. If they disobey, they lose their
“license to practice law.” Similarly, when the citizen files a criminal complaint
against a public official, the prosecutor is expected to protect the public official
from prosecution for official malfeasance by exercising some mystical doctrine
of “selective prosecution” (an act of misprision of crime) which is nothing more
or less than an excuse for legal prejudice to issue from the prosecutor’s office
calculated to overthrow the public’s legal redress against official malfeasance.

.

 

Claims Access Pursuant to Civil Rights Law

Improper enforcements which run counter to the U.S. Constitution can involve
as many as thirty-five (35) violations of the provisions of the United States
Constitution valued per 18 USC 241 (Conspiracy against rights) at $10,000 per
constitutional violation, per offense, per officer, per injured party when the
officer is acting as a part of a law enforcement agency effort.


The civil value is therefore approximately $350,000 per enforcement offense,
per enforcement officer, per injured party.    (more…)

 

.

The Solution

In order to survive in the commercial marketplace, the smaller bonding
companies have had to become more selective and scientific in their bonding
practice. 
In the past, bonding was based on marketing a bond which covered a broad
aggregate of “bondable” objects, acts and persons.   (more…)

 

A public official, clerk or servant shall lose his bond:

  • 1. if he interferes with the education of the public in matters of law and the
    “practice of law,”
  • 2. if he refuses to give to a citizen legal advice about a process with which
    he is familiar or if he refuses to give to a citizen legal advice which he is
    qualified to give because of his familiarity with and pertaining to the
    normal course of his public service. But no public servant or citizen shall
    be held legally liable for any information which he shall give when it is
    given upon demand, pursuant to a citizen’s written or spoken writ of
    mandamus (an order to come to one’s aid), pursuant to 42 USC 1986, the
    brother’s keeper statute of the United States.
  • 3. if he injures or oppresses any citizen who is acting in good faith and good
    behavior with a genuine and honest intent to practice law and/or to give
    legal counsel or assistance to other,
  • 4. if he tries to get a citizen prosecuted for “practice of law without a
    license” where there is no clear evidence of false advertising, fraud or
    injury to the party being counseled,
  • 5. if he tries to get a citizen prosecuted for “practice of law without a
    license” in order to eliminate competition in a litigation, a legal process
    or the legal industry generally,
  • 6. if he operates a court of the legal system as a facility of a legal labor
    union (bar association) reserved for state licensed attorneys only, that is
    as a closed union shop.    (more…)
2.2 – Bonding Taxation Statutes 
Just Compensation vs. Fraudulent Taxation

A government/public trust is supposed to operate on taxes, and if a government
operates commercial enterprises using tax money in competition with a free
enterprise public, then the money of the citizens is being used in competition
with the citizens, and that will discourage the payment and collection of taxes.
It will cause tax rebellion. (Conflict of interest) Therefore, all revenue raised by
a government’s offices of public trust must be obtained by the performance of
public
service not provided by ordinary free enterprise businesses. Public
service is the only sort of business in which a government is supposed to be
employed.
.
(“Nor shall private property [taxes] be taken for public use without Just

compensation
[valuable, publicly needed and publicly wanted service rendered
by government]”). — The 16th so-called amendment of the U.S. Constitution
does not base the assessment of taxes on services rendered
by the government
for
the public but rather upon the services rendered by public citizens for third
parties, hence, the 16th so-called amendment of the U.S. Constitution violates
the 5 th , so-called, amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Essentially, the only lawful personal tax assessable for operating a government
is a per
capita tax determined by dividing the cost of operating the government
by the number of emancipated citizens (or persons of majority age-eighteen
years old or older).     (more…)
.
2.3 – Bonding Exigency Statutes
Statutory Fraud

(Emotional Urgent Necessity Statutes)

A legislator is said to be engaging in the confidence game of statutory
fraud
when he by the legislation of statute(s) creates a false problem for, or artificial
or fraudulent need in, any citizen or group of citizens in order:

1. to justify the creation of the capacity to offer a solution for the false
problem created, or

2. to justify the collection of taxes or revenue to finance the solution of the
problem created.     (more…)
2.4 – Bonding Insurance Statutes
Compulsory Insurance

The bonding of statutes which require natural persons (non-incorporated
persons) to purchase insurance, must be very carefully analyzed, and be
regarded with
the utmost caution. As a general rule, it is against the law for
any entity to compel any citizen to pay any wager or premium for the privilege
of not being injured or for the privilege of not being threatened with injury
(Protection Insurance Racketeering).   [Footnote: U.S. R.I.C.O. Laws]

Corporations may be required by the state in which they are incorporated, to
purchase public hazard insurance because the corporation, being an
artificial/paper person (a legal fiction), is regarded as having no conscience
other than the state, making the state as a silent partner of the corporation,
financially responsible for the acts of the corporation. (That which the liege-lord
giveth, the liege-lord taketh away.)     (more…)
.

4.0 –  Judicative Input, Generally

An official, officer or clerk will not be bonded:
1. if he uses the power of his public office, or his position in that office, or
his power of enforcement

A. to harass
or to oppress a citizen, or
B. to create,
obstacles to prevent a citizen from exercising his
remedies
by the due course of law.   (MORE… )
5.2 — Bonding of District Attorneys
A city, county, state or federal district attorney (including a U.S. district
attorney called a “U.S. Attorney’) shall lose his bonding and shall not be
bonded:

1. if he refuses to properly identify himself to the citizen when asked to do
so, including giving the citizen the name and address (or telephone
number) of his bonding company and his bond policy number (bond
number),

2. if he fails or refuses to receive, for filing, a criminal complaint from a
citizen against a citizen or an official,

3. if he refused to mark or stamp the citizen’s confirmed (compare with
original) copy of the citizen’s complaint with any of the following

A. “Received”

B. name of receiving office

C. date

D. time

E. signature or initial of receiving clerk or official, so that the citizen
can have an official receipt for delivery of his complaint;

4. if he fails or refuses to make a reasonably diligent effort to process the
citizen’s complaint (42 USC 1986),   (MUCH MORE…. )
…If the judge is acting in insurrection and rebellion against the U.S.
Constitution, and the judge shows no signs of mending his ways or correcting
his court procedure, it is usually best for the ‘amicus curiae’ to file a notice of
criminal malpractice (malfeasance) with the court administrator, and with the
bonding company in person, by fax, or by telephone to immediately establish
reversible error and civil damage in the case.
6.1 Bonding of Judicial Consequence
A government official, officer, or clerk shall lose their bond, shall not be bonded,
and shall be deemed unbondable:

(1) if he fails to answer, or fails to require an answer to, a citizen’s complaint
and affidavit of information categorically point-for-point, except that, where
criminal accusations are made, he shall have the right to remain silent, or
allow silence (non-answer) as a protection against self- incrimination.
Otherwise, the ordinary rule is:

[ an affidavit unrebutted stands as the truth. ]
7.1 No Criminal Bonding
Criminal acts may not be bonded against prosecution or litigation or there
would be people who would become bonded as a license to commit criminal acts
in violation of the peace and dignity of the state.

If the Bonding Company does not Compel Prosecution

If the bonding company does not compel prosecution, then the first claim of
liability is against the bonding company up to the face value of the bond, and
the remaining claim of liability is against the corporation and against the
officer for the unpaid balance of the claim.

7.2 Bonding of Attitude

(1) the principles of economics are more and more being used to establish
scientific bonding practices which eliminate the bonding, hence employment, of
anti-social enforcement officers.

(2) the bond on an enforcement officer is based on the officer’s social attitude
and past performance, that is, his “track record.

(3) an antisocial officer is generally defined as a person who:

(a) has a bad social attitude

(b) thinks he is bonded- for any sort of social behavior whatsoever

(c) thinks he has to prove himself by being socially abusive or macho toward
members of the general public.

(4) antisocial officers create bad enforcement situations which cause citizens to
file malpractice claims with bonding companies.

(5) therefore a credible bonding company will not bond a known antisocial
enforcement officer.
7.6 Bonding of Municipal Corporations 
Many municipal corporations (city, county, state) have quietly chosen to
operate without malpractice bonding in violation of state corporate public
hazard bonding laws because their bonding is expensive.
9.1 Bonding Jail Procedure 
A government, or an official, officer, or clerk of a government will lose its/his
bond, will not be bonded, and will not be bondable if a person, hereinafter
referred to as the “prisoner”, which it/he handles, who has been charged and
arrested but who has not been convicted:

(1) has been denied or delayed anything, or any right, or the equal protection of
the law necessary for the prisoner’s defense which an uncharged and
unarrested citizen would have at his use, service, and disposal.
_____________________

Interesting notes found at bottom of this FamGaurdian doc:

“This was ripped from
www.freedom-school.com and should you have something
to add to this please feel encouraged getting it to us and we will modify this
accordingly.”
and

“Sovereign Confidentiality Notice: This private email message, including any
attachment(s) is limited the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain Privileged and/or
Confidential Information. Any and All Political, Private or Public Entities, Federal, State, or Local
Corporate Government(s), Municipality(ies), International Organizations, Corporation(s), agent(s),
investigator(s), or informant(s), et. al., and/or Third Party(ies) working in collusion by collecting and/or
monitoring My email(s),and any other means of spying and collecting these communications Without my
Exclusive Permission are Barred from Any and All Unauthorized Review, Use, Disclosure or Distribution.

With Explicit Reservation of All My Rights, Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me.

Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved
Rights.”
NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE IS NOTICE TO AGENT. NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE.
Download the complete doc here…
.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.