The Miracle was set up by one juror.  One of the eight jurors (supposed to be 12) had previously slipped a note to the judge which read, “Did I hear Ken Crowmar (sic) state that the IRS ruled the Cromars didn’t own any taxes?”

Throughout the trial the Prosecutor Jared Perkins continuously would blurt out “Objection! Res Judicata”, which meant that NO other court case of the 15 “Barbie & Ken” had been through could be talked about to the Jury except his case against us, and especially NOT the two US Tax Court (Washington D.C.) lawsuits against the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue (Charles Rettig) which Barbie & Ken WON.

This 100% Exonerated the Cromars of the original false Complaint in USA v Cromars claiming that they “owe $1,053,028.65 in federal income taxes”, which was used as the justification for stealing and auctioning off Barbie & Ken’s dream home!

There’s NO WAY the win-at-all-cost prosecutor could allow the Cromars’ US Tax Court case wins to be discussed before the Jury.  If the Jury heard those facts, what reasonable person could find Barbie & Ken guilty of Burglary of their own home!.   

But on Friday morning July 1, Danielle D’Angelo, a former neighbor who lived across the street from the Cromars for much of the turmoil leading up to the 75-man SWAT of September 2020, testified that she had indeed read the US Tax Court’s final ruling (doc #007 October 20, 2021) signed by Chief Judge Maurice B. Foley and testified that the Cromars were vindicated.

Prosecutor Perkins, as he had done to many of Barbie & Ken’s witnesses attempted to challenge their understanding of law said to Ms D’Angelo, “Are you an attorney?  How could you properly understand a court ruling?”  Her answer was, “I did read it.  It was in plain English.  It completely exonerated the Cromars of any federal income tax liability from 1990 through 2020.”  Perkins then turned witness Danielle D’Angelo back to Ken, who produced copies of the US Tax Court ruling which he handed to Perkins and the judge.  Madam Johnson sat on the bench and read the simple one-page ruling for about 5-minutes digesting the “plain English”.  She then excused the jury from the court.

Madam Johnson asked Perkins for his opinion.  “Mr. Cromar does not understand the meaning of this document,” and he continued to explain that he had researched the case and determined though it seemed complicated at first that it was simple, and that, “It does not say what Mr. Cromar thinks it does,” and offered a flippant dismissive and flawed interpretation.

Ken responded with, “Mr. Perkins likes to tell our witnesses that they can’t possibly understand law or the Constitution without the benefit of being BAR attorneys, but he is dead wrong.  But he himself is not even a tax attorney, and hence by his own standard incapable of understanding our US Tax Court win, and I can prove that fact very easily.

Ken explained that in lRS Commissioner’s final filing filing flipped from its original testimony filed in doc #004 of having served lawful federal tax lien notices on the Cromars, to instead agreeing with Barbie & Ken that there had been, ’No lawful Notices of Determination’ and ’No Notices of Deficiency’ served on the Cromars from 1990 through 2020”.

Ken went on to explain that Mr. Perkins could have and should have understood the meaning of the ruling, if he had actually read the Cromar’s filing just prior because they responded to the lRS Commissioner except that after the Cromar won, the US Tax Court removed their winning argument from the court record in doc #006 filed October 15, 2021, BUT NOT before Cromars had obtained a Certified Copy, attached here (PLEASE share this IMPORTANT tax-liability-claim-destroying argument far and wide)…

In the Cromars’ winning argument they agreed with Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction, but OBJECTED to the lRS Commissioner’s reasons cited in Motion in doc#004 to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.   In the Cromars’ response doc #006 above, filed October 15, 2021, they countered the lRS claim of ever having had lawful “federal tax lien notices” over the Cromars.  The lRS Commissioner Counsel’s pleading in doc #004 of Sept 9, 2021, claimed in paragraphs 10-17 that the lRS “DID provide Notices of Determination’ and Notices of Deficiency” because their super-duper computers – the “EUP”, “IMFLOT” and “IDRS” computers said so, while admitting not having the documents now.

Ken’s response said essentially, “Fine, Commissioner Rettig!  If you can’t find the original signed lRS declarations you say you sent to the Cromars, no problem sir.  If your records are as accurate as you testified that they are, then just simply go back to your super-duper “EUP”, “IMFLOT” and “IDRS” computers and recreate the Notices of Deficiency and Notices of Determination, and simply have the current lRS Commissioner simply sign (with a wet ink signature), as required by law, swearing to the accuracy of the recreated Notices under penalty of perjury.  Then you win!  But if you can’t or won’t, then clearly you never had lawful Notices of Deficiency or Notices of Determination and hence have no claim over the Cromars from 1990 through 2020.

Five days later US Tax Court Chief Judge Maurice B. Foley entered his ORDER, which Ken read on and for the court record, directly from the document as follows:

Unfortunately, the Jury was out of the court room when Ken read this into the record.  Ken called it “Unforgivable”, that a “judge seeking justice” has not allowed the jury to hear the “plain English” for themselves.

The Juror who wrote the note to the judge did not get his/her question answered.

Justice was not sought by this court.

In fact, when the Jury was brought back in, Ken attempted again to enter the US Tax Court ruling into the record, but the “judge” overruled, and instead had the prosecutor re-read a declaration to the jury that said essentially anything you may have heard about a court win over the lRS is not accurate and is NOT to be considered in your decision on guilt regarding “Burglary” charges.

“Game over”?  Mistrial?  Injustice?  Kangaroo court?  The destruction of “Barbie and Ken”’s quest for justice in behalf of ALL of We the People?  They say, “No way!  This is the Lord’s battle.  He wins.  We’re far from done.”