Brunson case #22-380 at Supreme Court called Brunson v Adams et al (388 Congressmen) which was denied in Jan 6, 2023 at behind closed doors in SCOTUS “Conference” with the “DENIED” announced Monday at 9:oo am January 9, 2023.
However, the Brunson were NOT discouraged, and Raland filed his “Petition for Re-Hearing” — the first of five opportunities — which occurred behind closed doors “Conference” on Friday February 17, 2023.
As of this writing, Sunday February 19th, SCOTUS has already made it’s decision, which will be publicly announced probably Tuesday the 21st, because tomorrow is President’s Day – a holiday.
M.S.M.’s IGNORING the Story Didn’t worked
— Now, It’s “Report and Destroy” to Sour the Public
The Main Stream Media (MSM propagandists) can no longer ignore the People or the possibility of SCOTUS’s actual power to remove from office of 388 Congressmen including Biden, Kamala, Pence and Pelosio, for those who broke their Oath of Office immediately – at any moment – whether they choose to take it to Hearings or not. In fact reading the NEWSWEEK story below, though not specifically stated, essentially acknowledges the POWER of the Supreme Court to adjudicate a case in the interest of National Security – that could remove from office those who clearly violate their Oath of Office — as in the “certification” (declare to be as true, honest and accurate) of an un-certifiable 2020 election without addressing over 100 members of Congress lawful demand for 10-day investigation of mountains of affidavits and evidence of the overnight FLIP of the votes from Trump to Biden.
So worry that taking the Brunson case to the Hearing process is dangerous to the Supreme Court Justices as Congress or others could try to wield the Constitution as a sword against conservatives. (Notice that the term “Republican” was not used – as many are R.I.N.O.’s – Republican In Name Only.) Some are afraid that SCOTUS could to claim conservatives should be removed from office because of their breaking their Oath of Office to “protect and defend the Constitution from enemies foreign and DOMESTIC”, with childlike sandbox bully tactics of, “if you do it to us, we’ll do it to you” temper tantrums.
Don’t fall for the Temper Tantrum — We’re WINNING!
“Bring it on!” Fighting about the Constitution is the right kind of fight to have, isn’t it? Actually this fight is decades and decades over due. Wouldn’t a debate suddenly put the spotlight on the Constitution and it’s provisions? Hallelujah! The Deep State players will lose that fight every time, as people are waking up to just what a FAIL the socialist / communist “strategies” are, based on the “fruit” of their actions.
For example: Biden’s Open Border policy has intentionally created a flood of ILLEGALs crossing our borders, and then these foreigners of unknown origin or intent into the country (millions of potential “Trojan Horse” enemies in the gate) have been scattered and systematically disseminated via plane, bus and rail throughout the nation in direct violation of the Oath of Office:
Article 4 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.
If we cannot control our borders we cannot defend our national sovereignty…..it’s that simple. Clearly, the enemies of our nation do not want this nation to survive. Sadly, many of our nation’s traitors are home born, and now in positions of authority throughout government. And clearly, in countless ways, the US Inc government including White House, FBI, CIA, lRS, EPA and many others, have declared WAR on the American people.
Who do you know that really believes that our US governments are really looking out for and protecting We the People? With government working and warring so hard against the People, could be argued that could do better with virtually no government at all?
With that perspective, now read the Newsweek article to see how the Deep State domestic enemies support, spin and try to protect their Deep State power and control over the people — including pushing us to international government that kicks the Constitution to the curbside — if they can….
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to consider whether or not to hear a lawsuit that seeks to remove President Joe Biden from the White House and reinstate former President Donald Trump to office.
The Brunson v. Adams lawsuit claims that lawmakers violated their oaths of office by allegedly failing to investigate a foreign intervention in the 2020 presidential race which allegedly rigged the election against Trump.
The case is based on the claim that the defendants—who include Congress members, Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and former Vice President Mike Pence—voted to certify the 2020 presidential election after receiving a valid request from 154 members of Congress to investigate unfounded claims of electoral fraud in six states.
The Supreme Court declined to consider the lawsuit on January 9, but the plaintiff, Raland Brunson, filed an appeal on January 23. Now, the court has to reconsider whether or not to hear the case, according to an update on the SCOTUS’ website that read that the lawsuit was “distributed for conference” on Friday.
Above, former U.S. President Donald Trump waves after speaking during an event at his Mar-a-Lago home on November 15, 2022, in Palm Beach, Florida. The U.S. Supreme Court is set to consider whether or not to hear a lawsuit that seeks to remove President Joe Biden from the White House and reinstate Trump to office. Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images
“The petition was denied. We will now make our next move,” Brunson wrote on Facebook after the court declined the case on January 9, Zach Schonfeld of The Hill reported last month. “A petition for reconsideration. Hang in their everyone,” Brunson wrote on Facebook following the decision.”
Brunson’s lawsuit claims that election fraud made his vote for Trump in 2020 invalid when he cast his ballot in Utah. He raised the case in lower courts which dismissed it for the lack of jurisdiction.
The suit named all 387 members of Congress who voted to certify Biden’s electoral votes and called for them all to be removed from their roles—along with Biden and Harris—and be prohibited from ever running for office again. Brunson also asked for over $2 billion tax-free in damages, according to The Hill.
In the appeal filed on January 23, Brunson argued that the court should grant a rehearing because the case “represents a very powerful domestic covert operation that is so benign that it cannot been seen on how it has breached our national security, and how it is affecting the national security of both Canada and Mexico, and how it has circulated fears that we might soon see the destruction of property along with a large volume of bloodshed in our own streets.”
__________________________
Comment: See how that works? Now that the propagandist MSM can no longer hide the story about the power of SCOTUS to help save our country, they have to “color” it with their FEAR-spin.
There ain’t nothing to fear about an honest discussion about the Constitution. The longer and LOUDER the discussion about the Constitution — and all who are breaking their Oath — the better.
Using the Constitution is how we Save America. Let the debate begin. Bring it on!!
.