News Release – 10/22/2022
Breaking News: Utah State Supreme Court’s Declaration of Corruption in Barbie & Ken Cromar vs Goliath IRS
Community Support Foundation
PO Box 139
Logan, Utah 84323
BARBIE & KEN CROMAR vs GOLIATH IRS, et al
Utah Supreme Court decision FAIL – Though Only 2 Sentences, Proves Utah Judicial Treason
As anticipated, the Utah State Supreme Court issued their response yesterday, October 21, 2022 at 5:01 PM, to the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Extraordinary Writ for Injunctive Relief filed on October 4, 2022 on behalf of Barbie & Ken Cromar.
The ORDER which denied “Barbie & Ken” Cromar’s appeal for Justice provided ZERO response to their 802 pages of facts in Law.
Never did so few words (only 29) say so much about judicial failure and Constitutional incompetence of Utah courts. That judicial incompetence and admission of treason is detailed here:
PROFITEERING FROM ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS RULINGS
Nine days after the filing of the Application with the Utah State Supreme court, Barbie & Ken received an email from the court requesting two court filing fees of $375.00 for the two case numbers assigned to the Application filing totaling $750.00.
In the interest of justice, Barbie & Ken contacted the Utah State Supreme Court and spoke with a court clerk who informed Barbie & Ken that they could file an Affidavit and Application for Waiver of Court Fees.
Upon reviewing the waiver form, Barbie & Ken stated that they could not submit to, nor understand the allegedly required court fees due to the nature of the thrice petitioned and thrice unlawfully ignored Habeas Corpus filings of June 24, 2022 in American Fork District Court, June 29th and July 1, 2022 Utah Appeals Court applications. Noting that Barbie & Ken now realize that the fees were errantly required and paid due to their emergency situation. They also requested that the errant filing fees be refunded.
Barbie & Ken stated that they were disinclined to pay court fees and costs as they had already paid numerous times and numerous ways (court fees, theft of their home, lives, reputation and honor, property, records, professional equipment to make a living, victims of “legal” kidnapping, forgery and identity theft, etc. etc.), over the past almost 59 months of judicial Abuse of Process, Denial of Due Process of Law, Malicious Prosecution and Judicial Treason in the Johnson Court, and other courts of various jurisdictions (US, State, and County) over the course of now 18 court cases (including this 18th case before the Utah State Supreme Court) wherein they have sought JUSTICE, or even the Appearance of Justice, which JUSTICE they have been denied.
Barbie & Ken stated that they continue to invoke the Law of the Land’s Constitutionally fundamental principle of Habeas Corpus, which by its supreme nature cannot be circumvented by requiring any sort of fee beyond that which is required by statute, nor can a “fee requirement” be used to delay or deny the activation of the Habeas Corpus by this, the highest court in the State of Utah, through which Barbie & Ken are pursuing lawful remedy heretofore denied them.
28 U.S. Code § 1914 – District court; filing and miscellaneous fees; rules of court
(a)The clerk of each district court shall require the parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in such court, whether by original process, removal or otherwise, to pay a filing fee of $350, except that on application for a writ of habeas corpus the filing fee shall be $5.
(b)The clerk shall collect from the parties such additional fees only as are prescribed by the Judicial Conference of the United States.
(c)Each district court by rule or standing order may require advance payment of fees.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 954; Pub. L. 95–598, title II, § 244, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2671; Pub. L. 99–336, § 4(a), June 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 637; Pub. L. 99–500, § 101(b) [title IV, § 407(a)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–39, 1783–64, and Pub. L. 99–591, § 101(b) [title IV, § 407(a)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–39, 3341–64; Pub. L. 104–317, title IV, § 401(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853; Pub. L. 108–447, div. B, title III, § 307(a), Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2895; Pub. L. 109–171, title X, § 10001(a), Feb. 8, 2006, 120 Stat. 183.)
Charging a filing fee that is 75 times greater than the required $5.00 application fee for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is unconscionable, but when it is multiples by the separating of cases into 2 separate filings or multiple denials, One can easily see that filings fees become a substantial source of revenue for these For Profit Court Corporations.
UTAH STATE SUPREME COURT FAIL – JUSTICES FUMBLE IN THEIR OWN END ZONE
While “Barbie and Ken” have become used to pattern of denial of Justice in the Utah Courts – this kind of high court FAIL was a remarkable.
The 34 page Application, along with the 768 pages of attachments (evidence) was answered in one short sentence by the Justices of the Utah State Supreme Court, “IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for extraordinary writ is denied.” ZERO explanation was offered.
Is this is how the highest court in Utah state deals with a foundational Constitutional principle of Habeas Corpus? By ignoring it?
No law. No statute. No excuse. No Constitution. NO NOTHING. All of which equals NO JUSTICE.
The Utah State Supreme Court has VOIDED its own Authority. The justices of the Utah State Supreme Court, by oath of office already concur:
“All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” [Marbury -v- Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803).
“Barbie & Ken” accept their offer that they’ve voided their own authority, by fabricating an Order that denies their sworn Oath of Office to protect and defend the Constitutions both the united States of America, and of Utah state.
This Supreme Court had “NO Discretion” (NO Choice) but to Certify the Writ of Habeas Corpus
As stated in the first paragraph of the Application, Applicants applies to the Utah State Supreme Court Clerk under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and URPC Rule 65B(a) because the courts have removed all available remedies available to Barbara and Ken Cromar.
“This is NOT an appeal, but rather a certiorari, a Non-Discretionary Application in the court, with an original jurisdiction, questioning authority and judicial process where the judicial branch has overridden the legislature with their own self-serving rules.”
In the lower court’s Order, the Utah State Court of Appeals’ Justices stated in their original order denying the third Application for Habeas Corpus,
“Extraordinary relief is only proper when the petitioner has ‘no other plain, speedy and adequate remedy’ at law“, and they further stated, “this court’s decision to grant extraordinary relief is entirely discretionary.” (emphasis added)
.
UTAH STATE SUPREME COURT ADMITS TO HIGH TREASON
The details of the filing was provided in the previous News Release, but are bullet-pointed here.
-
- “ALL PLEADINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO DO SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE”
-
- COMMON LAW = THE CONSTITUTIONAL = LAW OF THE LAND = GOVERN THIS COURT
-
- COURTS MAKING UP THEIR OWN LAWS?
-
- LICENSED TO LIE – DISHONESTY, FRAUD, DECEIT AND/OR MISREPRESENTATION
-
- IMPOSTER! JUDGE JOHNSON PRETENDING TO BE A JUDGE ACTING WITH AUTHORITY
-
- FEDERAL TITLE 18 U.S. CODE § 241 AND 18 U.S. CODE § 242 APPLY
-
- MEMORANDUM ON HIGH TREASON
(See the News Release of October 5, 2022 for those details)
VIOLATIONS OF THE OATH OF OFFICE ARE AN ACT OF TREASON
While Barbie & Ken were hopeful that the Utah State Supreme Court would find in their favor, realistically they were expecting another quick endorsement or rubber stamp from the Utah State Supreme Court condoning the illicit actions of the lower courts.
It has been our experience, that all of these judges have a total disregard for their oath of office under Title 28 Section 453, the oath in which all judges swear to uphold the U.S. Constitution.
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
Rest assured, the approximately 200 oath-breakers, including Christine Johnson, the prosecution by David O. Leavitt’s Office, and all of the other numerous participants (INCLUDING THE U.S. ATTORNEY DISTRICT OF UTAH – PAST & PRESENT) in the charade against Barbie & Ken have a complete and full knowledge of Barbie & Kenr’s innocence and the intentional orchestrated destruction of their lives, liberty and the pursuit of their happiness. Some will, of course, be given the benefit of the doubt to be only “useful idiots” – as Karl Marx called them.
As noted, Barbie & Ken, in the interest of justice, were seeking protection of superior court (Utah State Supreme Court), the highest in the State of Utah, from an inferior Provo judiciary “that has gone off the rails” in a destructive course of Abuse of Process and Wrongful Use of Judicial Authority designed to circumvent Four (4) Writs of Habeas Corpus in an attempt to justify a trial that should have never occurred, was in Mistrial before it began, along with numerous attempts to deny the Barbie & Ken of due process of law, while covering a multitude of criminal actions, by those who have sworn in their oaths of office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
As a reminder, Article 1, Section 9, paragraph 2 states:
“The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”
Any unlawful action by the courts to subvert, deny, or refuse original jurisdiction of Habeas Corpus is an act of treason against We the People and both Constitutions (US and Utah).
The final judgment of this Court should have been to vacate all of the charges under Rule 60(B). The Court was requested to weigh the interest in substantial justice against the simple need for preserving finality of the judgment. See Expenditures Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc. v. Smithsonian Institute, 1974, 500 F.2d. 808, 163 U.S. App.D.C.140. See also Brown v. Clark Equipment Co., D.C. Mc. 1982, 961 F.R.D. 166.
THEREFORE, the APPLICATION:FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, and EXTRAORDINARY WRIT FOR INJUCTIVE RELIEF UNDER URCP 65B, should have been granted because it was NOT an appeal, but rather a certiorari, a Non-Discretionary Application in the court, with an original jurisdiction, questioning authority and judicial process where the judicial branch has overridden the legislature with their own self-serving rules. Utahns, the World, and Heaven are still watching!
We the People and filers of the Friend of the Court Brief in defense of Barbie & Ken declare, IT’S TIME FOR THIS CHARADE TO END! and recognized that kangaroo court actions have made VOID all of the claims against Barbie & Ken (a living and breathing man and woman who stand only under God and the Supreme Law of the Land) and that this for-profit CORP court (EIN #87-6000545 & DUNS #009094301) has no lawful jurisdiction over them.
The Community Support Foundation continues to publicly acknowledge the TRAVESTY OF INJUSTICE, so grossly displayed in the case against Barbie & Ken and reminds everyone that:
“Together, we stand together with Barbie & Ken, and demand that they be acquitted of any and all claims against them, dismiss this tyrannical case with prejudice, and facilitate a process that will restore them back to their home and property immediately, and reconfirm our nation’s belief that communities are bound together by a common unity in principles, such as the “Principles of Good Business©,” and that “good conduct” is a mandatory requirement by society and the community at large.” – Where there is smoke, there is fire!
This judicial atrocity against Barbie & Ken has been thoroughly documented and shows just how far the rails the Department of Justice (DOJ) has gone. Barbie & Ken’s story should serve as a warning to everyone, including a President of the United States, of what renegade members of the DOJ (WHO HAVE BEEN LICENSED TO LIE) are willing to do. If “they” can do this to the beloved and iconic “BARBIE & KEN,” WHO NEVER OWED ANY OF THE FEDERAL INCOME TAXES THAT THE IRS FRAUDULENTLY CLAIMED, — THEN WHAT CAN THEY DO TO YOU?
.
Gen. Berger: “DOJ IS THE ENEMY AND WE ARE AT WAR!”
Now that the Utah State Supreme Court’s order to dismiss the Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ for Extraordinary Injunctive Relief has been rendered, their decision only confirms General David H. Berger’s warning to President Donald J. Trump that the DOJ IS THE ENEMY AND WE ARE AT WAR! – Now it looks like it will be up to the US Supreme Court or the Military to obtain justice. But sadly as it has been repeatedly stated, it appears that military is our only real solution.
May GOD bless us all, at this late hour and keep us safe in the cause of Liberty and Justice for All.
Truth & Evidence v. Lies — Provided by the Pound
Follow the Barbie & Ken’s’ progress here: www.MiraclesInGodWeTrust.com/BarbieandKenvGoliathlRS/ and more detailed articles at https://www.cedarhillscitizens.org/
The 768 pages of Attachments countering the court’s fairy tale that “Barbie & Ken” did not provide sufficient evidence is located at the Cedar Hills Citizens website. It is clear that the courts are not interested truth & evidence. Barbie & Ken have just provided a damning weight of evidence to Utah Supreme Court by the pound! Their action or inaction will say more about Utah court justice, than it will about Barbie & Ken.
Tom Fairbanks
Community Health Advocate
Community Support Foundation
(385) 467-3315
communitysupportfoundation@protonmail.com
.