If a picture paints 1000 words, this pic needs only one

If a picture paints 1000 words, this pic needs only one – MISTRIAL?!

Written By: admin - Jul• 24•22

On July 1, 2022, after a very brief jury deliberation, a jury of 8 found Ken & Barbara Cromar “Guilty” of two felonies; “Burglary of a dwelling” of their own home! and “False Appropriation” of their own home.

The Jury was denied by judge Christine Johnson and the Prosecutor any information regarding their two wins in US TAX COURT – Washington DC – where in they were vindicated.

Therefore, it was no surprise that within minutes after the courtroom emptied, the group below was seen in the Utah Fourth District Court, engaged in a lengthy, animated, laugh-filled and familiar conversation. Did they already know each other? Numerous witnesses said it sure looked like the knew each other. How is that possible with an impartial jury?

Were Barbie & Ken found “guilty” by a Jury of the Prosecutor’s peers?

Possible Jury Tampering?

The Cromars were NOT involved in any way in the jury selection as they were denied their denied their right to contracted Counsel, and were waiting in the gallary for the court to follow Constitutional Law 101 in the Habeus Corpus that should’ve stopped the Trial until FOUNDATIONAL issues and abuse of law and process were addressed. There were many “strange things” going on including the questions to potential jurors, like:

Do you associate with any ANTI-government groups?

The Prosecutor’s questions were designed to prejudice the jurors before they were selected. It was akin to asking, “So Mr. Smith, how many times a week do you beat your wife?” The questions created the damage.

The Cromars were denied Counsel, Subpoena process, preparation, and selection of jury in meaningful way, by JUDICIAL ABUSE OF PROCESS.

Mistrial?

The battle is clearly not over, though the abuse and denial of due process to Barbie & Ken continues.