Use the Constitution or Lose it!
Four brothers, Deron, Loy, Raland and Gaynor Brunson – professional trumpet players were shocked by the questionable results of the 2020 election. They saw an election where President Donald J. Trump had a massive lead at about 10:00 when suddenly all counting in critical swing states was shut down for the night — and by morning all those counts had MAGICALLY flipped in favor of Joseph Biden, — the former Obama Vice President who rarely left his basement for campaigning. It didn’t make sense. How could Biden, who could hardly inspire even a handful of people to his speeches, while by comparison Trump rallies filled stadiums to over flowing — often with thousands standing outside the stadiums but listening in. It was fishy. Then all the reports, pictures, and video surveillance footage started rolling out.
Suit cases filled with ballots, machines counting same votes multiple times, identical ballots coming in by the stacks, paid couriers stuffing ballot boxes in the late night, etc. etc.
Crooked! Rigged!!
Affidavits and video and testimony of vote rigging poured in. Congress chose to ignore the voice of the People – and despite 100 Congressmen acting as credible witnesses and calling for a lawful 10-day pause to investigate possible compromise of counting by foriegn enemies (China in particular), “certified” and declared the vote legitimate.
The Brunson Brothers saw a problem. They decided that their rights had been compromised and that National Security had been breached in violation of the Oaths of Office of the 388 Congressmen, including Biden, Kamala, Pence and Pelosi — and filed lawsuits. After near two years of working their way from the lower state courts, into the federal District and Circuit Courts, — they finally landed with a case #22-380 in the Supreme Court of the United Stated (SCOTUS).
Four Brother had taken on “The MONSTER” that is the Deep State. Their question was simple:
“Does the Oath of Office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from enemies foreign and domestic have meaning?
“And if so, shouldn’t the 388 members of Congress who broke their Oath of Office be fired, removed from the Capitol (and White House), and be required to pay millions of dollars in penalties, and blocked from ever serving in any government at any level — [even as dog catcher]?”
The Miraculous $2.9 BILLION CASE AGAINST 388 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, including Biden, Kamala, Pence & Pelosi
A landmark case by Utah’s own Brunson Brothers — one of who was Barbie & Ken Cromar’s neighbor seven houses away — has worked their 2020 election complaint AGAINST 384 members of CONGRESS and FOUR OTHERS totaling 388 individuals, all the way through Utah State, Federal US District, and Tenth Circuit Courts. Now, almost two years later, with TWO well-documented but UN-investigated fraudulent elections on record, the BRUNSON case has FINALLY made it all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS).
Coincidentally on the two-year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 peaceful protest at the US Capitol – where hundreds were arrested, and imprisoned through an Abuse of Process of Law in the “DC Gulags” — the Brunson Brothers’ case #22-380 went to Conference. This is where the Supreme Court Justices meet behind “closed doors” to determine which of the numerous cases they will take to the Hearing process. If there were four justices who vote to Hear the case then the court hearing process leading toward oral arguments in front of the justices would begin. With only three or less votes then the case is simply “Denied”.
In the weeks leading up to the January 6, 2023 “Conference” Loy Brunson, acting as the spokesman was a popular guest, and was invited onto several talk shows and podcasts.
The Brunsons created a Telegram Channel and a couple of websites where people could learn about and follow the case. Over 60,000 letters in support of the Brunson case were sent to the Supreme Court – with a copy of each letter simultaneously going to Brunsons.
TELEGRAM – https://t.me/BrunsonBrothersSCOTUS
Brunson Info – www.7discoveries.com
Brunson NEW website – www.BrunsonBrothers.com
Raland Brunson’s orginal website – www.RalandBrunson.com
The prayers and support were phenomenal.
Unfortunately, the January 6, 2023 Conference resulted in a DENIAL to hear their case — without any explanation or disclosure of votes, as is customary.
However, the Brunson Brothers were NOT discouraged. They had stated even before the Conference that they were not leaving anything to chance and were prepared with fall back plans if they were denied.
Their plans were put into action as they filed their first of five opportunities to “Petition for Rehearing” at the next SCOTUS Conference where cases are considered for Hearing. They had 30-days to file their Petition, but did it much quicker.
The Brunson Petition for Re-Hearing is scheduled for SCOTUS Conference on Friday February 17, 2023
OVERVIEW
Pursuant to the matter of Raland J. Brunson vs. Alma S. Adams, et, al., The Community Support Foundation, a grassroots organization involving citizens across the country, is submitting this Amicus Curiae on behalf of the Petitioner(s) Raland J. Bruson and “We the People.”
“If one of the people are harmed by the court, then ALL ‘We the People’ are harmed.
“If one of the people can secure justice, then ALL ‘We the People’ enjoy justice.”
.
Therefore, we offer that very few Americans are even aware of their right to present a Affidavit and offer their thoughts and opinions pursuant to specific cases before our courts. Through this process of AFFIDAVIT – in this matter, the Community Support Foundation is informing citizens that they can participate in this process. Therefore, we “Petition for Redress of Grievances” herein as authorized by Article I of the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, hence requiring no inferior state or federal statute to do so.
Washington DC, USA exterior of Supreme Court building marble architecture and closeup on Capital capitol hill columns pillars by entrance and sign
The Founding Fathers gave the People a Constitutional Republic and any officer of this court who believes our nation is “a democracy” should be fired for judicial ignorance, malfeasance and incompetence. Democracy is mob rule by the majority. The beauty of our Divinely inspired Constitution for those intelligent enough to understand it, know that it is the “greatest document ever struck off by the hand of man” (Gladstone) for one simple reason: The original United States Constitution protects the rights, privileges and immunities of the individual from the tyranny of the majority (democracy). The individual is the sovereign, NOT the government. Government was established by the Founders to protect the sovereign – just as far as it can go before it affects another. Again, when the individual’s rights are protected from the majority, every individual is protected that comprises the whole, liberty-empowered whole that is We the People.
The country has been adversely affected by the actions of the 388 Respondents (Congressmen / Biden / Kamala / Pence & Pelosi) far beyond the inconvenience, defamation, and economic losses of the petitioner. Therefore, in this case, when we see One of the “We the People” (the petitioner), being greatly harmed by government tyranny.
If one is harmed by government tyranny, then ALL of “We the People” are harmed.
And such is the case with Raland Brunson’s Certiorari #22-380 – as one of We the People he has been trespassed, harmed and damaged, and this honorable Court is called upon to remedy in behalf of Raland Brunson, his three brothers, and indeed ALL of the People!
The 388 Defendants’ blatant violations of trust have weakened the fabric of confidence that binds the country together to such a level that if the Defendants are not stopped and summarily punished, the confidence restored and revitalized, – then that national fabric may decompose beyond repair – which could devolve the nation into a cataclysmic, bloody second Civil War.
PETITIONER’S ALLEGED MATERIAL FACTS
- FACT – The PETITIONER’S action is brought against 388 federal officers, in their official capacities, which include President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Michael Richard Pence (the Respondents).
- FACT – The Respondents have taken the required Oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and as such they are liable for consequences when they violate the Oath of Office.
- FACT – Respondents were properly warned and were requested to make an investigation into a highly covert swift and powerful enemy, as stated below, seeking to destroy the U.S. Constitution and the united States, purposely thwarted all efforts to investigate this, whereupon this enemy was not checked or investigated, therefore the Respondents adhered to this enemy.
- FACT – The Respondents intentional refusal to investigate this enemy, the Petitioner, Brunson, brought his action against the Respondents because he was seriously personally damaged and violated by the action of Respondents, and consequently this action unilaterally violated the rights of every citizen of the U.S.A. and perhaps the rights of every person living (“we the people”), along with all courts of law.
- FACT – On January 6, 2021, the 117th Congress held a proceeding and debate in Washington DC. The Proceeding was for the purpose of counting votes under the 2020 Presidential election for the President and Vice President of the United States under Amendment XII.
- FACT – During the Proceeding over 100 members of U.S. Congress claimed factual evidence that the said election was rigged. The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this congressional claim is an act of treason and fraud by Respondents. A successfully rigged election has the same end result as an act of war; to place into power whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens (“we the people”) and the courts of law.
- FACT – Brunson’s case represents a national security breach on an unprecedented level, never seen before, seriously damaging and violating Brunson, his brothers, and collectively every citizen of the U.S.A. (“We the People”) rights, and the courts of law.
- FACT – Despite the grave importance of this case, the trial courts granted the Respondents motion to dismiss by stating Brunson’s action was dismissed without prejudice.”
- FACT – Brunson’s opposition (which was not properly addressed by the lower courts) has standing and this court has full proper jurisdiction to rule on the merits of this case.
Our Rights are God-given and un-a-lien-able and entrusted temporarily to government employees who are Servants of THE PEOPLE?
The Constitution of the United States along with State Constitutions do not grant rights to the people. These instruments we designed to measure, bank, curb and cool the power of the rulers but in no way do they do not measure the rights of the governed, and nor are they are not the fountain of law, nor the origin of the people’s rights, but rather acknowledge the pre-existence of these un-a-lien-able, God-given rights, privilege and immunities. The US Constitution and the Constitutions of the various states, have been put in place to protect individual People’s rights from the government and other people. Therefore, the statutes and case law cited by Respondents claiming immunity from Brunson’s claims are unconstitutional and this Court needs to rule in that manner.
The Oath of Office itself proves that the false doctrine of “absolute immunity” a complete fallacy by the simple fact that the oath-taker solemnly swears and promises to protect the Constitution from both “enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC”. In other words, taking an oath of office does NOT crown the person as a king or queen with a god, — now infallible – and as such hence incapable of domestic sedition, treason, incompetency, or just plain stupidity. Fortunately, The Supreme Law of the Land, makes no mention of “intent” or “stupidity”, but rather addresses actions, such as the 388 Defendants’ failure to allow the “10 days to review the complaints, affidavits, etc., before certifying an election as presented by Brunson.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. The purpose of the Constitution was written to protect our self-evident rights. Constitution cannot be construed by any means, by any legislative, judicial and executive bodies, by any court of law to deny or disparage the rights of the People.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made Pursuance thereof; . . shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” (Article VI of the Constitution)
This Amicus Curiae invokes and endorses Brunson’s use of the First Amendment of the Constitution which states:
“Congress shall make no law prohibiting the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
The courts have consistently held that fraud vitiates whatever it touches, Morris v. House, 32 Tex. 492 (1870)”. Estate of Stonecipher v. Estate of Butts, 591 SW 2d 806. And “It is a stern but just maxim of law that fraud vitiates everything into which it enters.” Veterans Service Club v. Sweeney. 252 S.W.2d 25. 27 (Kv.1952).” Radioshack Cory, v. ComSmart, Inc., 222 SW 3d 256.
As per declaration by the U.S. Constitution, this court is lawfully endowed with authority to remove the Respondents from their offices under 18 U.S. Code § 2381 which states:
“Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”
The Respondents, who have taken the Oath of Office, and have, in fact, actually violated their oath of office – whether intentionally, ignorantly or stupidly, it matters not – and as such have adhered to a domestic enemy, and must be removed from their office, as correctly suggested by Brunson.
Brunson does have an unfettered right to sue the Respondents under the serious nature of his claim, and no legislation can measure Brunson’s right to sue the Respondents. Furthermore, Brunson’s allegations against Respondents’ adhering to a domestic enemy, and committing acts of fraud are not protected by any kind of legislation of jurisdictional immunity. Essentially, acts of Congress cannot protect fraud, nor protect the violation of the Oath or that give aid and comfort to enemies of the United States Constitution or America as alleged in Brunson’s complaint against the Respondents.
It is an incontestable fact that the Respondents committed fraud and treason breaching our national security, thus adhering themselves to a domestic enemy that continues to breach our national security on a daily basis. This national security breach is having the same end result as an act of war; to place into power the one whom the Respondents want, which in this instant case was one Joseph Robinette Biden and a host of others.
Therefore, this court must immediately grant to Brunson the removal from office all trespassing Respondents and damages he seeks in his complaint. It is necessary to secure our national security while there is an opportunity to secure it, and do so without further delay.
Jurisprudence requires this Court to revoke the doctrine of equitable maxim that it created and to instill the doctrine of the object principle of justice more thoroughly throughout the entire court system in America.
If SCOTUS Does NOT Uphold and Enforce the Oath of Office
– Isn’t another Civil War highly likely?
Finally, the US Supreme Court’s ruling will confirm this Court’s position as to whether public opinion does, under the Supreme Law of the Land in the Constitution in fact, matter.
Through the matter before this Court, we see that the Judicial System has become dysfunctional and inefficient,at best, and very corrupt at its worst. Certain laws have been passed and actions taken that, in effect, reward(pay money, perks, or subsidies) to those who are willing to subvert the law.
As a society it seems that we have allowed a classist division to divide the People against each other, us and it is time to question whether or not our governing system will provide the protections that are guaranteed by the Constitution.
One only needs to review the local news sources in virtually any city in American to see that something is greatly amiss. In fact, many of those sources have been referenced to the concerns raised herein. “Where there is smoke, there is fire!” The Cambridge Dictionary of American Idioms suggests the meaning of this phrase is, “ifit looks like something is wrong, something is probably wrong.”
George Washington, Founding Father, General, First President and the first signer of the US Constitution declared:
“Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”
Under the Constitution all are equal. No one is above the Law. If the Supreme Court doesn’t choose in Conference on February 17, 2023 to Hear the Raland Brunson vs. Alma Adams et all case against 388 members of Congress, then they will be saying that the Oath of allegiance to protect and the defend the Constitution from enemies foreign and DOMESTIC doesn’t matter. And if they choose to ignore this Landmark case, they will essentially be VOIDING their OWN AUTHORITY — and maybe committing TREASON at the same time?
[Please Note: Loy is from our beloved Cedar Hills and was a neighbor of “Barbie & Ken” Cromar – also closed to knocking the Supreme Court’s doors with their Habeas Corpus case. It is hoped that the FOUR will soon be allowed let out a four-part harmonious trumpet BLAST off the steps of the SUPREME COURT prior to entering the Court to have their case Heard!]
See the following article to read Raland Brunson’s Petition for Re-Hearing …
Do your part. It’s time to pray for Miracles!
.
Loy Brunson kindly texted me, Ken Cromar, this morning and alerted me to this breaking story…
Now, we’re being a little bit silly, but the absolute TRUTH is that the Constitution is the MOST POWERFUL weapon we have to help save this country! What’s also important to point out is that it also the most peaceful weapon, that will cost the least number of lives.
In addition to McCarthy’s November tweet, House Republicans passed a 
Note: The Word doc above is provided because YOU can personalize YOUR Affidavit, adding or subtracting to have it say whatever it is YOU want to say to the Justices of the Supreme Court. Please make it your own! Do it.
