Attention Carter/Baenz:

Monuments are never built to the Critics – Just for the Patriot Heroes

Not that Deron needs any help, but to us, “Barbie & Ken” Cromar of Cedar Hills Utah, neighbors and supporters of the Brunson case at the US Supreme Court, the Carter/Beanz arguments are circular and dead-ends.  It’s almost as if they are jealous that they were “out-Lawyered” by some non-lawyers.  For example, we are not aware of anyone filing a now historic SCOTUS Rule 11 filing basing their arguments on a significant national emergency regarding risk to an election by foreign enemies.

A few examples of some of their fatally flawed ideas include:

  1.  The Brunson case was deemed “frivilous” by the 10th Circuit – therefore Carter/Beanz infer that if SCOTUS  were to deny Hearing the Brunson case (which happened since the article and Deron Brunson’s response) that it would be because Raland Brunson v Alma Adams et al, was “frivilous”.   The well-meaning but conflicted Adam Carter/Tracy Beanz wrote:

“Merits Of The Case

“We have read the lawsuit filed by the Brunson brothers. In our honest opinion, it does not seem to have any basis in constitutional law. Frankly speaking—as found by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in their dismissal—it’s “frivolous.”

In our situation, “Barbie & Ken vs Goliath lRS”, non-attorneys, we are on a collision course with the Supreme Court ourselves, after suffering through 18 court cases for 61-months, and most recently had had our Habeas Corpus case denied by the Utah Appellate & Utah Supreme Court. We are that much closer to US Supreme Court.  Along the way, we have been amazed and amused by how regularly the term “friv0lous” is by opposition counsel when they have NO answer to our LAWFUL premises and arguments.  The term is thrown around more as a “shut up” on the playground when the bully isn’t smart enough to come up with an intelligent answer.  So, instead of providing an explanation of what “isn’t frivolous” or the “correct” interpretation, the courtroom bullies just attempt to dismiss by calling “stupid!” — which in the “honorable” courtroom vernacular the equivalent for “stupid” is to declare someone’s argument “frivolous”.  Those declarations of “FRIVOLOUS!” (STUPID!) without offering any sort of legal explanation whatever.

We began to consider it “a Win” and their admission conceding defeat, each time they would declare “frivilous”! Carter/Beanz seem to have fallen into the same trap of admitting Brunsons case has merit because they rely on the 10th Circuit Court’s magical wave of the hand and declaration of “frivilous” to assume it so, — though neither the 10th Circuit nor Carter/Beanz could possibly explain why in legal terms that they’re going to call the Brunsons “stupid” (friv0lous).

2.  To make our next point we do so with a couple of questions:  a. ) what case of Constitutional significance and historical value have you ever argued before SCOTUS?  and,  b.)  have you Carter/Beanz ever seen or argued at SCOTUS the Constitutionally fundamental issue of violation of Oath of Office addressing protecting the Constitution from “enemies…Domestic”?   Surely you can’t possiblly believe that in today’s boiling pot of money, power, corruption, intrigue, weaponization of IRS, FBI, CIA etc, that there is NOT a hint of “domestic enemies” roaming the streets of Washington DC, the Halls of Congress?  Why haven’t you Carter/Beanz seeing “domestic enemies” not reported such misprision of felony and misprison of treason to the appropriate authories as required by law to protect the nation and the Constitution your oath as an attorney requires?  WHY?

And now that four brothers – fearing for the future of their nation – thankfully void of the burden of the BAR club membership and go-along-to-get-along institutionalized complicity – NOW complain when someone with much more bravery and honor and love of country steps forward demanding that “servants” in We the People’s government are actually HELD TO THEIR OATH OF OFFICE.  If you can’t answer that question, — and you can’t — you’ve made ours and the Brunson Brothers’ case for us.

The Carter/Beanz position comes from one in a conflict of interest as the practice law is parasitic in nature, and money motivated — and like prostitutes ever willing to “take a position” for money, and it doesn’t necessarily matter which side, so long as the check clears the bank.  In other words, it appears that Carter/Beanz cannot take a 100% altruistic position that they are fighting regarding this SCOTUS issue to help save the Republic but rather to collect their next check.  Maybe I’m wrong, but until Carter/Beanz can point to their own heroic actions to hold official to their Oath of Office, Please sit down and stop being “frivolous”.  Thank you!

3.  Last example from the Adam Carter/ Tracy Baenz article, the confess that:

“Now we will be the first to admit our constitutional processes are not functioning as our founders intended. We are only speaking to how the system was designed to function.”

Again, you make our point for us.  It’s easy for Carter/Beanz to point and ridicule those far more courageous and honorable than themselves.  They are right that “our constitutional processes are not functioning as our founders intended”, which is reasonable to concludes means that the Constitutional oaths of office are NOT being upheld and those violating their Oaths are being allowed to wreck havoc and destroy the nation with impunity.  Again, IF you can’t make a real difference by keeping your Oaths to protect the Constitution from “enemies…domestic”, then stop being “frivolous” and get out of the way of those who intend to honor the countless lives sacrificed in blood to protect and defend the Constitution.

 

Suggestion:  Please Don’t Mess With Deron Brunson

He paid the price to learn what he knows, and his education bought and paid for in “the books”, late nights, and battles in court, — and was NOT purchased from an over-priced cookie-cutter, precedent-centric legal education rather than foundational Constitutional -centric LAW upon which the courts of this land are supposed to operate.

Carter/Baenz, how will you feel about your snarky and petty article if and when history proves that indeed Chinese operatives both “foreign and domestic”, traitors amongst us actually plotted to destroy this nation, — but people like the Brunson Brothers stood up and helped carry off the Constitution triumphantly in the face of almost certain discussion – while you were cashing your weekly check?

 

 

The slick Adam Carter / Tracy Baenz article here…

https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/30/the-truth-about-the-brunson-case/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Emperor Has No Clothes

see…   https://jonmcnaughton.com/the-emperor-has-no-clothes/

 

 

So MANY QUESTIONS about TRUST for the oxymoronic “UtahTrust.gov” officials:

• How is it possible that Utah’s government employees are self-bonded by an entity UtahTrust.gov ?
• Doesn’t self-bonding via a .gov defeat the purpose of having an outside entity insure and indemnify the We the People from abusive, tyrannical government employees who may breatk the law and/or endanger the lives, liberty and property and pursuit of happiness they are supposed to protect — but FAIL to do so?
• Doesn’t self-bonding create a built in conflict of interest wherein the bonding company — which is also the government — be inclined to protect it money / assets from payout for collectable violations on the bonds?
• Could it be that the self-bonding incentivizes the government entities to NOT provide PUBLIC information access about the Bonds and bonded individuals?
• Could it be that there is NO money in the Bonding company and that it has been stolen by un-indicted co-conspirators probably from within the highest levels of government?
• When was the Utah Local Governments Trust last audited?  And audited by whom?  A .gov Utah governmental entity? Or brother, cousin, best friend of the governor?

 

______________________

 

Setting the Stage:

The Bonding Problem

As human population increases and mutual human tolerance decreases,
municipal corporations tend to become less sensitive to individual human needs
and tend to become more antisocial toward the public.

It has been put crudely
that municipal corporations become slaughterhouse operations with law
enforcement officers running the sledgehammer department.

Judges ignore the
rights of the people and legislators generate heaps of laws, without perfecting
the ones already existing to make them fit for bonding. Defective statutes and
defective legal processes become an invitation for every sort of official
malpractice and malfeasance including economic oppression, and the public, in
retaliation, begins suing for every injury, putting the heat on the bonding
companies.

For details see https://FamGuardian.org/Subjects/Freedom/Immunity/uniform-bonding-code.pdf

 

______________________

 

December 29, 2022

 

Sent via email & Certified USPS mail: #7022 0410 0002 9777 8105

 

Steven A. Hansen – CEO       steve@utahtrust.gov

Jeff Rowley – Claims Manager    jeff@utahtrust.gov

Jody Pettet – Accounting Manager         jody@utahtrust.gov

c/o Utah Local Governments Trust             www.UtahTrust.gov

55 South Highway 89

North Salt Lake, UT 84054

.

Re: Utah GRAMA & Freedom of Information Act Request regarding bonds, insurance, and other items related to various alleged Utah government employees / officers and/or officials as listed.    (Note: CC’d to Utah Attorney General via Chief of Staff at rcantrell@agutah.gov & via Certified USPS mail: #7022 0410 0002 9777 8112 for possible future Criminal Referral.)

.

Mr. Hansen, Mr. Rowley and Mr. Pettet,

This is a lawful request for records / information under the Freedom of Information Act (F.O.I.A.), The Sunshine Act 5 U.S.C. § 552b, and Utah Public Records 63-2-301 (GRAMA), we request that a true and accurate simple answer the question YES or NO (check √ or mark as appropriate), if you have any records and/or information related to Utah Code 52-1-13.  Sureties — Approval — Personal surety bond — Requirements (see below) on each of the following alleged Utah government employees and/or officers and/or officials at any time during the year of 2022, please:

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah Supreme Court]:

Matthew B. Durrant                           YES ___   NO ___

John A. Pearce                                    YES ___   NO ___

Diana Hagen                                        YES ___   NO ___

Paige Petersen                                     YES ___   NO ___

Jill M. Pohlman                                  YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah Appeals Court]:

Michele M. Christiansen-Forster       YES ___   NO ___

Ryan M. Harris                                     YES ___   NO ___

David N. Mortensen                             YES ___   NO ___

Gregory K. Orme                                  YES ___   NO ___

Ryan D. Tenney                                    YES ___   NO ___

Kate Appleby                                         YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah Administrative Office of the Courts]:

Bryson King                                         YES ___   NO ___

Stacey R. Haacke                                YES ___   NO ___

Keisa L. Williams                                YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah Attorney General Office]:

Sean D. Reyes                                     YES ___   NO ___

Heather Chesnut                                 YES ___   NO ___

Ric Cantrel                                            YES ___   NO ___

Josianne E. Petit                                  YES ___   NO ___

John Earl Sullivan                               YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly connected to Utah Governor Office]:

Spencer J. Cox                                     YES ___   NO ___

Deidre Henderson                               YES ___   NO ___

Jenney Rees                                         YES ___   NO ___

Gary Herbert                                       YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly connected to Utah Fourth District Court]:

Christine Johnson                              YES ___   NO ___

Kraig J. Powell                                    YES ___   NO ___

James M. Brady                                  YES ___   NO ___

Robert Lund                                        YES ___   NO ___

Anthony Howell                                 YES ___   NO ___

Lynn Davis                                           YES ___   NO ___

Debbie Jacobsen                                 YES ___   NO ___

Roena Gammon                                  YES ___   NO ___

Mark Urry                                            YES ___   NO ___

Amber Evans                                       YES ___   NO ___

Nancy Baldarrago                               YES ___   NO ___

Mark Colby                                           YES ___   NO ___

Heather Henrie                                    YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah County Attorney Office]:

David O. Leavitt                                 YES ___   NO ___

Jared Perkins                                      YES ___   NO ___

Adam Pomeroy                                  YES ___   NO ___

Ben Stanley                                         YES ___   NO ___

Rob Moore                                          YES ___   NO ___

Dale Eyre                                             YES ___   NO ___

Laura Mendoza                                   YES ___   NO ___

PJ Maughan                                        YES ___   NO ___

Lisa Maxine Estrada                          YES ___   NO ___

Eric Johnson                                       YES ___   NO ___

   (Former attorney for Cedar Hills)

Brad Sears                                           YES ___   NO ___

   (Former mayor for Cedar Hills)

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah County Sheriff Office]:

Mike Smith                                         YES ___   NO ___

John O’Hara                                       YES ___   NO ___

Eldon Packer                                       YES ___   NO ___

Robert Weidlein                                  YES ___   NO ___

Spencer Cannon                                  YES ___   NO ___

Nathan Crawford                                YES ___   NO ___

Larry Evans                                          YES ___   NO ___

Mitchel Bailey                                      YES ___   NO ___

Jory Provostgaard                               YES ___   NO ___

James O. Tracy                                    YES ___   NO ___

 

 

Alleged Utah government employee [possibly at Utah County Attorney Office]:

Andrea Allen                                       YES ___   NO ___

Jeffery Smith                                      YES ___   NO ___

Jason Thurlow                                    YES ___   NO ___

Sarah Miller                                        YES ___   NO ___

Michelle Araujo                                  YES ___   NO ___

 

Please note that no specific record is being requested for any of the individuals related to Utah Code 52-1-13., but rather, we are simply trying to determine if you have any record / information related the named entities, in that we have had no success in receiving GRAMA requested Bond related records from many of the above alleged Utah government employees/officers/officials. [Bond / Surety instrument GRAMA requests related to the above list may or may not come at a later date.]

We Intend to Collect lawful compensation for unlawful violations of Law in trespass against us by certain alleged Utah government employees/officials and/or officers, and are simply attempting to confirm if any record or information on the above alleged Utah government employees may be maintained YES or NO by the Utah Local Governments Trust – thus helping us consider and determine if your entity may have records on them, and if and how we may make a lawful claim against those who are required to have indemnity instruments described in Utah Code 52-1-13, etc., that may or may not be maintained by Utah Local Governments Trust. Simple. Easy.

52-1-13. Sureties — Approval — Personal surety bond — Requirements.
In all cases a bond is required of any public officer in this state, either a corporate surety bond or a personal surety bond may be given. Such bonds shall be subject to approval as provided by law. No personal surety bond shall be approved except with two or more sureties and each such surety shall first make and file an affidavit setting forth that he is a resident and freeholder within the state of Utah and is worth the sum specified in the undertaking, over and above all of his just debts and liabilities and exclusive of property exempt from execution and shall include in such affidavit a detailed statement of all of his assets and liabilities; and the making of any material false statement in respect thereto shall constitute a felony; provided further, that when there are more than two sureties thereon, they may express in their affidavits that they are severally worth amounts less than that expressed in the bond if the whole amount of all sureties is equivalent to double the penalty of the bond. No premium on any surety bond with personal sureties shall be paid from any public funds. The several boards, courts or officers authorized by law to approve bonds herein referred to may require sureties on personal surety bonds to justify annually and, in case of failure to so justify, such boards or officers may require additional sureties or a new bond. In case of failure of any public officer to have his sureties justify when so required or to furnish additional sureties when required, as herein provided, the board or officer charged with the duty of approving the bond of such officer shall declare such office vacant within 60 days after notice personally served upon the officer, and at the expiration of said 60 day period such office shall become vacant unless such sureties justify or additional qualified sureties be furnished within said period.

Note: Public official surety bond related requests fall under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, The Sunshine Act 5 U.S.C. § 552b, Utah Public Records 63-2-301 (GRAMA) invoked herein, and by law you are obligated to supply us with this information within 10 business days of email receipt.

 

This GRAMA REQUEST under Utah Code 63G-2-203 as follows:   

 

Please provide a simple response “YES” or “NO” (checking √ the appropriate designation right into this document if helpful to expedite the reply) that Utah Local Government Trust maintains any record / information on the named alleged Utah government employees / officials and/or officers – thus confirming or denying their status as a lawful employee / officer and/or official, as required of such under Utah Code 52-1-13.

 

√   YES, we may be found the subject of existing or future records as it relates to our Intent to Collect on various violations of Law by the alleged Utah government employees / officials and/or officers.

√   YES, we want the records for FREE as a public service as this is requested in the public interest (We the People) of as we attempt protect our lives, rights and freedom from corrupt, tyrannical government officials which is to be included in a likely forth coming documentary film production for the benefit of the public – and fellow Utahns particularly.  (see Utah Code 63G-2-203)

√   YES, if NOT agreeable for FREE we are willing to pay, and offer $50 as a guesstimate for what should be a simple database search requiring little if any time, but which will instantly be responded to if cost $$ estimate is provided by email, so we may quickly make payment electronically a.s.a.p.

√   YES, please provide the records to both emails:  kencromar5@gmail.com and barbaracromar@gmail.com , with signed hard copy sent via USPS mail to the address below.

√   YES, we REQUIRE these confirmation of record existence YES or NO regarding each alleged employee / officer / official within 10 working days from email receipt, December 29, 2022 by January 13, 2023 without fail.

Please remember that “Open & Honest” government need not obfuscate, deflect or delay a direct answer to direct YES or NO questions – as lawfully required by Utah’s GRAMA law.

Thank you for your most expeditious, professional and timely fulfillment of this lawful request.

Sincerely,

 

 

________________________                   __________________________

Paul-Kenneth: Cromar                   &        Barbara-Ann: Cromar

Producer / Director / Screenwriter

Former Cedar Hills Councilman – July 1994 to January 2000

c/o 9870 N. Meadow Drive

Cedar Hills, Utah  [84062-9998]

801-400-5900

– or –

PO Box 942

Pleasant Grove, Utah  [84062-9998]

CC: Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes via Chief of Staff at rcantrell@agutah.gov & via Certified USPS mail: #7022 0410 0002 9777 8112

 

 

________________________

 

 

 

________________________

 

Misc.  HIGHLIGHT from FamGuardians’ PDF which can be downloaded here…

* FamGuardian.org – uniform-bonding-code

BONDS

Organized Crime in Government
Government officials maintain control of the courts by “licensing lawyers” and
by forbidding the common citizens to “practice law” or give “legal advice,” three
phrases which have never been adequately defined for any statute. To protect
government dominance, “law schools” are the only schools allowed to teach law,
and specifically “safe law” (attornment).

.

To protect malfeasance, attorneys are
forbidden to file criminal complaints against malfeasance officials, officer and
clerks and against officers of other corporations. If they disobey, they lose their
“license to practice law.” Similarly, when the citizen files a criminal complaint
against a public official, the prosecutor is expected to protect the public official
from prosecution for official malfeasance by exercising some mystical doctrine
of “selective prosecution” (an act of misprision of crime) which is nothing more
or less than an excuse for legal prejudice to issue from the prosecutor’s office
calculated to overthrow the public’s legal redress against official malfeasance.

.

 

Claims Access Pursuant to Civil Rights Law

Improper enforcements which run counter to the U.S. Constitution can involve
as many as thirty-five (35) violations of the provisions of the United States
Constitution valued per 18 USC 241 (Conspiracy against rights) at $10,000 per
constitutional violation, per offense, per officer, per injured party when the
officer is acting as a part of a law enforcement agency effort.

The civil value is therefore approximately $350,000 per enforcement offense,
per enforcement officer, per injured party.    (more…)

 

.

The Solution

In order to survive in the commercial marketplace, the smaller bonding
companies have had to become more selective and scientific in their bonding
practice.  In the past, bonding was based on marketing a bond which covered a broad
aggregate of “bondable” objects, acts and persons.   (more…)

 

A public official, clerk or servant shall lose his bond:

• 1. if he interferes with the education of the public in matters of law and the
  “practice of law,”
• 2. if he refuses to give to a citizen legal advice about a process with which
  he is familiar or if he refuses to give to a citizen legal advice which he is
  qualified to give because of his familiarity with and pertaining to the
  normal course of his public service. But no public servant or citizen shall
  be held legally liable for any information which he shall give when it is
  given upon demand, pursuant to a citizen’s written or spoken writ of
  mandamus (an order to come to one’s aid), pursuant to 42 USC 1986, the
  brother’s keeper statute of the United States.
• 3. if he injures or oppresses any citizen who is acting in good faith and good
  behavior with a genuine and honest intent to practice law and/or to give
  legal counsel or assistance to other,
• 4. if he tries to get a citizen prosecuted for “practice of law without a
  license” where there is no clear evidence of false advertising, fraud or
  injury to the party being counseled,
• 5. if he tries to get a citizen prosecuted for “practice of law without a
  license” in order to eliminate competition in a litigation, a legal process
  or the legal industry generally,
• 6. if he operates a court of the legal system as a facility of a legal labor
  union (bar association) reserved for state licensed attorneys only, that is
  as a closed union shop.    (more…)
  

4.0 –  Judicative Input, Generally

If the Bonding Company does not Compel Prosecution

7.2 –– Bonding of Attitude

“This was ripped from www.freedom-school.com and should you have something
to add to this please feel encouraged getting it to us and we will modify this
accordingly.”

“Sovereign Confidentiality Notice: This private email message, including any
attachment(s) is limited the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain Privileged and/or
Confidential Information. Any and All Political, Private or Public Entities, Federal, State, or Local
Corporate Government(s), Municipality(ies), International Organizations, Corporation(s), agent(s),
investigator(s), or informant(s), et. al., and/or Third Party(ies) working in collusion by collecting and/or
monitoring My email(s),and any other means of spying and collecting these communications Without my
Exclusive Permission are Barred from Any and All Unauthorized Review, Use, Disclosure or Distribution.
With Explicit Reservation of All My Rights, Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me.
Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved
Rights.”

It was a “Tragic” WEEK for Satan’s minions working at the lRS.

“Tragedy” #1 –

Funding for 87K new lRS employees GONE!

FIRST, – on Monday January 9, 2023 – – with a beautifully-shackled-by-20-patriots, NEW House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, the 118th Congress voted to DEFUND the “new and improved” lRS Biden promoted with 87,000 NEW agents.

Recruitment Question:  “Are you willing to use weapons against Americans when acting an lRS agent?”

Hallelujah!   The 118th Congress took the money away.  Bye-bye 87,000 new lRS agents.

See the following news stories below, including Main Stream Media (M.S.M. – normal Deep State propagandists), and the gold mine of stories with a simple search.  (We recommend using SwissCows.com)

 

NY POST:  House passes bill nixing $72 billion in funding for 87,000 new IRS agents

 

CNN:  House approves rules package in key test for McCarthy’s speakership

House passes bill rescinding IRS funding for new agents

MORE at:   https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/new-congress-01-09-23/h_9dda6ac41636173fc307ccc09f57fc7b

 

Yahoo NEWS!:  House Rescinds Funding For New IRS Agents, Which Could Delay Tax Refunds if Senate Agrees

The U.S. House of Representatives — under the leadership of the new speaker, Rep. Kevin McCarthy — recently voted for a bill repealing planned funding to hire 87,000 new IRS agents, CNN reported.

“This was our very first act of the new Congress, because government should work for you, not against you,” McCarthy tweeted.

The bill passed along party lines, with a vote of 221 to 210. However, it is highly unlikely it will pass through the Democrat-controlled Senate.

MORE at:   https://news.yahoo.com/house-rescinds-funding-irs-agents-203730688.html

 

House Republicans Pass Bill to Defund 87,000 IRS ‘Agents’

By a vote count of 221-210, House Republicans made good on their campaign promise to defund the 87,000 IRS “agents” President Biden vowed to employ through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

The vote on the “Family and Small Business Taxpayer Protection Act,” came down along political party lines with two Democrats and one Republican not having voted on the measure.

Republicans see their first majority bill passing as a huge victory, but the measure will probably never get to President Biden’s desk. With Democrats controlling the Senate, the House bill is not expected to as in the upper chamber, unless moderate Democrats like Sen. Krysten Sinema and Joe Machin vote in favor of defunding those future IRS agents.

MORE at:   https://floridianpress.com/2023/01/house-republicans-pass-bill-to-defund-87000-irs-agents/

 

________________________

 

“Tragedy” #2 –

The lRS may soon be GONE altogether!

However, what shall we do?  What should happen with the existing Satan’s minions lRS employees still lying & terrorizing Americans, destroying marriages and families , and regularly push people to suicide — while ignoring the LAW?

House to vote on bill to abolish IRS and replace income tax with ‘Fair Tax’

The Republican-led House will vote on a bill to abolish the IRS and replace the existing income tax system with a wide-reaching consumption tax.

Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA) introduced the legislation, the Fair Tax Act, on Tuesday. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) agreed to allow a floor vote on the legislation as part of a deal cut with the conservative House Freedom Caucus to become House speaker, Fox News reported.

The bill, which has a near zero chance of becoming law during this Congress, envisions simplifying the tax code by scrapping the income tax, payroll tax, corporate taxes, gift taxes, and the death tax altogether and replacing them with a nationwide consumption tax on goods and services. The IRS as an entity would also be killed by the legislation.

MORE at:  https://famguardian.org/house-to-vote-on-bill-to-abolish-irs-and-replace-income-tax-with-fair-tax/

 

Whatever the Fate of the Fair Tax Act, Congress Should Still Abolish the IRS

Getting rid of the much-despised tax agency would be a good idea. It’s unlikely to happen anytime soon.

MORE at:   https://reason.com/2023/01/13/whatever-the-fate-of-the-fair-tax-act-congress-should-still-abolish-the-irs/

 

House Republicans aim to abolish IRS, replace income tax

The new speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy, R-California, agreed as part of a deal with conservatives in the Freedom Caucus to win the speakership to allow a vote on a bill that would abolish the Internal Revenue Service and institute a “Fair Tax” that would replace federal income taxes and other taxes with a national consumption tax administered by the states.

On Monday, House Republicans passed a bill to strip the IRS of much of the extra $80 billion in funding for enforcement enacted last year by Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act, although the bill is not expected to advance in the Senate, which is still controlled by Democrats. On Tuesday, Rep. Earl L. “Buddy” Carter, R-Georgia, introduced H.R. 25, The Fair Tax Act, to replace the current Tax Code with a national consumption tax known as the Fair Tax.

MORE at:   https://www.accountingtoday.com/news/house-republicans-plan-vote-to-abolish-irs-replace-income-tax-with-consumption-tax

 

 

________________________

 

.

Does ANYONE believe the lRS is honest and honorable in ALL their dealings with the American people?

Is there any sane person that wants to come to the defense of the deceitful lRS corp, its methods based in fear, and masters financing Satanic purposes?

Does ANYONE trust the US federal courts when they support the lRS in their courts outside of due process of law?

Did you know that the lRS is notorious for sending out their notices of audit and  other evil intent around holidays with special meaning like just before Christmas and Valentines Day etc.  This is not surprising considering who they work for; the most feared collection power on the earth or in the history of the world.  Their “boss”?  Satan himself, who ironically uses our own $$ to finance nefarious action, blood and horror on the sons and daughter of God not only in America, but the world, — in the name of “government” and we the people – saddly with our own money.  That’s just how sick & twisted  Lucifer is.

Why does Satan love his evil lRS and its supporting minions and the corrupt courts that “legally” enforce their will on innocent people to terrorize them — and then when possible send out their “love letters” threatening audits, and “notices of deficiencies”, etc., etc., if at all possible days before Christmas for maximum terror & stress?

“Barbie & Ken” have harmed or stolen from no one.  We were minding our own business and living our lives, which have been irreparably damaged.  Turn about is fair play, especially when we’re simply defending ourselves and the God-given, un-a-lien-able rights, privileges and immunities protected by the US and Utah Constitutions — as He would have us, His son and daughter do.  Amen.

 

.

Final SURPRISE Question:

DING-DING!!

Yikes!  What if the “controlled demolition” of the funding for 87,000 New lRS agents, AND possibly the lRS in total — is being done to bring in “Flat Tax” and “the NEED” to be able to collect it through a “new digital currency” so the government though “starting at only 15%” it could eventually be whatever % percent they decided to take electronically — at anytime – because the government “needs” it?

And, “Of course, because we no longer have an IRS, just like you get direct-deposits to your bank account, we the government need direct-withdrawals from you using our NEW digital currency and Big Brother control of your life, OK?”

Wouldn’t it be wiser to DEMOLISH the lRS — and return to the Constitutional approach that thoroughly funded government effectively — and keep it small — from the beginning at birth of the nation, all the way to 1913.

 

.

 

.

There is saying, “Turn about is fair play”.   Dear Utah Supreme Court Chief Justice Matthew B. Durrant,  WARNING via this “OFFICIAL NOTICE”…!

.

For the full doc see Kate Appleby PDF at bottom.

 

After suffering 5 years 1 month, 18 court cases, the stealing of our home, 2 SWATS – one of 13+ US Marshal led SWAT and a 75-man SWAT – kidnapping, identity theft, misprision of felony & misprision of treason by government officials, not to mention the pain and suffering — the “tables were turned” three days before Christmas with lawful SERVICE to 13 government officials endorsing ongoing malicious prosecution.

The above is page #1 of a 87-page OFFICIAL NOTICE Service that include LAWFUL warning to DO NOT TRESPASS on us, Barbie & Ken, and the amounts you will pay if you do, as follows:

A.  – Cover Letter to the living man or woman in personal liability outside of “immunity”

B.   – Public Notice, Declarations, Mandates, and Lawful Protest – “CHECKMATE”

C.   – Courtesy Attachments available to the public at Salt Lake County Recorder filings #13703837 BK 11198 and, #13715599 BK 11205:

1.  “Lawful Claim of Title, Will, Execution of Will, Declaration of Status, Appointment of Trustees and Standing Orders for Same” (#8)  

2.   “Ordinance of the Estate of Paul Kenneth Cromar and Notice of Same” (#10)

3.   My “Indorsed Uruguayan Birth Certificate” [corrected] – with Spanish to English translation (#4a).

4.   Ordinance and Fee Schedule for the House of Cromar (#7).

.

Checkout this “silver bullet” PUBLIC NOTICE, DECLARATIONS, MANDATES, AND LAWFUL PROTEST document that has resulted in over $200 MILLION in defaulted invoices to date, ready for collection from their BONDS and/or their personal assets, homes, cars, lands, cabins, boats, gold & silver etc, until they’ve PAID their damages to “Barbie & Ken” IN FULL.  Misprision of Felony and Treason is another matter for a lawful tribunal, military if necessary – or heavenly tribunal eventually.

 

13 – ” C H E C K M A T E S “

For the full doc see Kate Appleby’s PDF as filed by Clerk on Court docket, at bottom.

.

We, “Barbie & Ken Cromar vs Goliath lRS”, in our pursuit of JUSTICE, 100% Vindication, and the Return of what’s left of our Home, Lives, Honor and Pursuit of Happiness, or at least the receipt of financial damages, served 13 Utah State Supreme Court Justices, and Appellate Court judges, were SERVED legal documents literally putting them in lawful “CHECKMATE” to hold them PERSONALLY accountable — outside any presumed “immunity” (a false judicial doctrine – no one is above the LAW) —  for their un-Constitutional actions / trespasses against us.

Cheif Judge Matthew B. Durrant (the highest Utah judge) first pages shown above and below with the Kate Appleby 87 page doc as filed on the Docket despite call to Court Clerk Lisa Collins confirming these “are NOT filings – but rather Service the the man or woman – NOT the employee” – The following 13 Oath-breakers were served almost identical docs received by:

Acting sometimes as not so “honorable” Utah Supreme Court Justices

Matthew B. Durrant *

John A. Pearce

Diana Hagen

Paige Petersen

Jill M. Pohlman

Acting sometimes as not so “honorable” Utah State Court of Appeals Judges

Michele M. Christiansen Forster *

Ryan M. Harris

David N. Mortensen

Gregory K. Orme

Ryan D. Tenney

Kate Appleby   (“Senior Judge” – invited in to make second 3-panel judges)

 

Acting sometimes as not so “honorable” Associate General Counsel / Administrative Office of the Courts / BAR Attorneys

Bryson King

Stacey R. Haacke

 

We do NOT hate nor resent the deceived “useful idiots” (Marx’s term for those who unwittingly serve Satan’s purposes) who work for the lRS or corrupt courts, judges and prosecutors — despite their intent to rule by FEAR with their tyrannical assaults on the People — so often at holidays.  However…

 

We FEAR for those who compromise their SOULS

and BREAK their Oaths in the name of “Government”

Therefore, please note that 5 Utah Supreme Court Justices, and the 6 Utah Appellate Court Judges including a “Senior Judge” Kate Appleby (see her Service below), and a couple (2) BAR Attorneys in the Office of Utah Courts General Counsel were ALL SERVED on Thursday December 22, 2022 at their offices, but served as individual living men and women (not in their official capacity).

The pre-Christmas Service of was done in hopes of eliciting the same kind of stress and displeasure for a “taste of their own medicine” — so that they might reconsider their dishonorable actions and the resulting karma and fate to their immortal souls IN THIS LIFE where they have a chance to reconsider, REPENT, and REPAIR the pain and suffering they cause — Rather than suffer for it eternally in the HELL of their own making for ETERNITY.  We do NOT want that for them.

Wake up government “servants”!  You are NOT gods.  We are NOT your slaves.  We are your Boss, and you work for us.  Ends do NOT justify the means.

We the People are INNOCENT until proven guilty.  And NO! you should never receive any sort of compensation (“kick-backs”) for the number of cases, convictions and incarcerations, and other incidents of Denial of Justice in your secret pension accounts  (“CAFR” accounts – good luck finding that on the now thoroughly scrubbed internet record).

 

CLICK here for the above 87-page CHECKMATE doc set…

2022 12 22 – OFFICIAL NOTICE to the woman Kate Appleby – filed incorrectly in Utah Court Appeals case #20220899 under MISC

.

 

BIDEN Going down?

   Democrat Liability?

      Sacrifice on altar of DEMS?

 

TUCKER CARLSON TONIGHT  –  JANUARY 12, 2023

 

Remember New York Gov. Mario Cuomo?

Remember how the Democrat party abandoned him?  And easily cast him aside?

The same signs are now happening to Joe Biden.

 

Is Joe on the way out?

Is the White House Staff / handlers helping him out the door?

Signs that it’s true:

1.  Kamala is unusually happy and giggly.

2.   The White is pushing Joe out in front the microphones to allow him to TRY to explain himself.  DISASTER and self-implosion.

 

You Watch!   You Decide!

 

 

 

 

What’s Real?

.

.

 

.

 

The Luciferian Globalist Playbook To Exterminate The Human Race!

– Mike Adams Must Video

.

.

 

Pastor Sanders & Ken discussed SPIRITUAL MATTERS surrounding National Survival as it relates to the Supreme Court ….

.

Click on the above icon to PLAY.

.

On Monday morning, the United States Supreme Court announced their January 6, 2023 Conference DENIAL to hear the Raland Brunson vs. Alma Adams et al. against 388 members of Congress, including Biden, Kamala, Pence and Pelosi, for breaking their oath of office, by NOT pausing the certification of 2020 election.

Ken had spoken with both Loy and Deron Brunson (the legal mind behind their successful run) after they got the bad news and reported on their reaction.

The claim by the Brunson Brothers  is that over 100 Congressmen (“credible witnesses”) with numerous affidavits and evidence, including DNI (Dept National Intelligence) Ratcliff report that likely China interference in election risked national security.

 

 

If SCOTUS had 4 votes to hear the case, then the Brunsons would have been off and running preparing to enter the Supreme Court to make oral arguments.

However, it had been hoped that they would have ruled in favor of the Brunson, fired 388 members of Congress and removed credentials via the Sgt at Arms and White Secret Service and block their entry as they would have been found to have broken their oath of office and risked national security — in this case to China and possibly other “foreign enemies”.

 

SCOTUS FAILED Big!

Frankly, it appears that SCOTUS FAILED in their own duty under sworn Oath of Office, to address possible treason when alerted to such (in Misprision of Treason) and may now have EXPOSED THEMSELVES to possible charges of the same – for the exact same reason!

It was a dark Monday morning for the Brunsons, who refuse to give up and will be filing an appeal for reconsideration within 30-days.

 

 

(Loy Brunson is of Cedar Hills Utah who with Ken Cromar former CH councilman has been on the Pastor’s show December 19, 2022, here…)

National Radio: Baptist Pastor Sanders & Pastor Larsen invited on “Utah Mormons” LOY BRUNSON and Ken Cromar

 

 

 

.

Subject:  The Brunsons have already succeeded!

.

Dear Friends,

“Another 12 months of this! I don’t know how many people will be able to hold on.”.

NOT EVERYTHING IS AS IT APPEARS!!!!!

The game is not over, it’s only half time.

“We’re filing a petition for re hearing. When it’s docketed for conference we’ll talk about it. We also have another case in federal court that has not been dismissed.  We’re going to win this so fasten your seatbelt!”

_________

.

.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:

Note:  Tom Fairbanks of Community Support Foundation and Ken Cromar neighbor of Loy Brunson 7 houses down and former Cedar Hills Councilman — wrote the FIRST “Friend of the Court” Brief (Amicus Curiae) for the Brunson Brothers case in the Supreme Court.  See it here…

Breaking News: SCOTUS – Friend of the Court Brief on Behalf of Raland J. Brunson

 

_________________________

 

 

 

 

Brunsons briefly mentioned here in…

                 https://www.bards.fm/e/ep1956_bardsfm-fishers-of-men/

____________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you don’t know your rights, you don’t have ’em!

STUNNING!  At 12:30 a brave young man (25?) respectfully, firmly stands down an over-bearing and tyranical officer at a general alcohol traffic stop.   ENJOY!

https://www.bards.fm/e/ep1955_bardsfm-become-educated-and-fight/

 

Battle cry of truth via BARDS.fm famous SHOFAR blast….

.

.B

 

 

 

 

 

388* + 9 = 397*! 

Trust in the Lord.

“Trust in the LORD with all your heart
And do not lean on your own understanding.

In all your ways acknowledge Him,
And He will make your paths straight.

Do not be wise in your own eyes;
Fear the LORD and turn away from evil.”

Remember….

 

.