Q. When is a “Public Defender” worse than a Vampire?

Written By: admin - Aug• 19•22

A.    When you can’t drive the stake in it’s heart deep enough to kill it.

In a communication dated August 17, 2022, Ken & Barbara Cromar were compelled to write to Lisa Maxine Estrada with their:

DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST from your, Lisa Maxine Estrada’s, continued fraudulent claim to be our authorized “counsel of record”, with an CONDITIONAL INVOICE  #2270817a attached for $2,980,000, which you agreed to pay (March 25, 2022), for reasons that include but are not limited to those presented as follows:

2022 08 17 – 1of2 – DEMAND to CEASE AND DESIST from fraudulent counsel of record – NOTICE OF DEFAULT with CONDITIONAL INVOICE

 

The Cromars have been trying to have Ms. Estrada removed from the court docket as their “counsel of record”, reminding her:

“We have never contacted you to officially engage or accept your service as our counsel and you have no reason to think, assume, or presume otherwise. “

In fact, on the hearing record, and in writing the Cromars have explained that they have not had a BAR attorney in their many cases, nor do they intend to ever hire a BAR attorney, because of the undisclosed assumptions and presumptions that are deceitfully taken including the Power of Attorney to sign their name without their knowledge.

Ms. Estrada herself had attempted to quit prior to Trial, in her June 6 filing “Utah County Public Defender Association’s OPPOSITION to Court’s Appointment of Provisional Counsel”, though the Cromars didn’t know it, as they were not informed or served by Ms Estrada. And the Trial continued anyway, without her in attendance.  Though Ms. Estrada pressed to be released recently, judge Christine Johnson Ruling granted Ms. Estrada’s request to be released, but “only after sentencing”.

Thus completing the fraud on the record of the court – fabricating the “legitimacy” of a “fair trial”. The exact opposite was true, as Barbie & Ken were denied their contracted counsel Eugene Paul Richardson, and denied right to file their defense, subpoena their witnesses, or have a “Trial by a jury of Peers” and instead had a “jury trial” eight they were not party to selecting.

The Cromars’ concern is understandable, because they face sentencing on August 19, and the judge appears to have fraudulently used Ms. Estrada’s name to fabricate the appearance that the Cromars had “competent assistance of counsel” when they’ve never spoken with her, as she never responded to any of their communications.  The only communication came AFTER the Trial on August 15 just days before sentencing.  But if a name is listed under “Represented by” as it is with “LISA MAXINE ESTRADA” then the record of the court falsely gives the impression that “Barbie & Ken” had her as their attorney.

Having Estrada’s name on the record compromises their opportunities for remedy and appeals. BUT, the Christine Johnson will NOT allow her to leave the record until AFTER the sentencing!

The Cromars wrote to her reminding her  of their Fourth and Final NOTICE via COMPETENT COUNSEL CONTRACT offer that established the conditions under which Barbie & Ken might consider her.  She never responded to the Offer, and was not selected, as the following document shows:

 

 

2022 08 17 – 2of2 – EXHIBIT B – 2022 03 22 – Fourth & Final Notice via Competent Counsel Contract OFFER to Lisa Maxine Estrada

 

The Cromars wrote to her:

 

We, barbara & ken, are the victims of “tyrannical government gone wild” with unsubstantiated nor adjudicated claims in federal court in alleged “federal income tax” in a case where we were never granted a hearing let alone trial. As an attorney, that’s violation Law 101 right to due process. That’s all you need to know to understand that we’ve cheated out of our home, life, liberty, and honor. The real criminals are those who use the courts for their personal advantage at the expense of justice for the People. We, “Barbie & Ken”, continue to suffer the effects of IRS / DOJ attorneys who filed a fraudulent via a civil “Complaint” in US District Court (Salt Lake City) in UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. CROMARS et all (case # 2:17-cv-01223-RJS) claiming that we “owe $1,053,028.65” in “unpaid federal income taxes”, which we have ever maintained and we never owed, the truth of which is now proven by US Tax Court’s Chief Judge Maurice B. Foley’s October 20, 2021 ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. This ORDER now provides Us, Barbara and Ken, and a candid world, and to You, Ms. Estrada, admission by the Commissioner of the IRS himself with absolute proof of our complete vindication of all IRS claims and related charges throughout now 18 trickle-down cases against the Defendants (in error) PAUL KENNETH CROMAR and BARBARA ANN CROMAR, vindicating us for a 31 year period from 1990 through 2020. We “Barbie and Ken” are now Exonerated! (Ibid – Docket #155 – SIXTH JUDICIAL NOTICE: EXONERATION of all IRS Claims Against Cromars from 1990-2020 by US Tax Court / Washington D.C. / Chief Judge Maurice B. Foley’s ORDER For Dismissal For Lack of Jurisdiction)

 

The Cromars wonder if they will ever find justice, but Trust that God’s final and perfect Justice ultimately prevails.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.